Day 3: The Omen (1976)

Director: Richard Donner

Starring: Gregory Peck, Lee Remick, David Warner, Billie Whitelaw

Runtime: 111 minutes

What’s scarier than a cross-dressing psychopath or flesh-eating zombies? The Antichrist, of course! Though preceded by The Exorcist (1973), this movie would, besides spawning several sequels, help establish the Satanic/religious subgenre. Of the two most foundational and prominent examples of this subgenre, I think that The Omen is a far superior film. I always found The Exorcist to be more silly than scary (a young girl spewing pea soup seems a waste of the Devil’s time), while The Omen is more quirky, subtle, and more devastating in its implications—through his child, the Antichrist, the Devil plans to take over the world.

Despite its influence, and the instant recognition of Jerry Goldsmith’s “Ave Satani” theme (again illustrating the importance of music in a good horror film), I feel like the movie is underappreciated (in comparison to other classic horror). So many things go into the power of this movie, although there is no single overwhelming element that I can think of that centers the film, which perhaps helps to explain its lesser recognition. Peck, Remick, Warner, and especially Whitelaw as the exquisitely creepy Mrs. Baylock, all put in great performances, but none of them really overshadows the other actors. The pacing lets the mystery unfold smoothly, neither too slow or fast-paced: action speeds up at just the right moments, like when the father, Robert Thorn and the reporter, Keith Jennings, find the jackal skeleton, and are chased away by a pack of demonic Rottweilers.

Billie Whitelaw

Billie Whitelaw as the demonic nanny, Mrs. Baylock. She is one creepy woman!


The death scenes in this movie are also graphic and memorable: the nanny who hangs herself, the priest impaled by a lightning rod, and most famously, the decapitation scene! The glass plate which slices off Jennings’ head is often ranked on lists of most memorable moments or deaths in film history. Robert Donner planned that scene intricately, and was purposefully trying to make the audience uncomfortable; he figured that some viewers would cover their eyes to avoid seeing the head fly through the air for three seconds, so he intentionally kept the camera on the severed head longer.

The Antichrist himself, at least in this film, isn’t that memorable for me. The child (played by Harvey Spencer Stephens) is cute, but not quite creepy until the end, when the U.S. President (who is Damien’s uncle) takes his hand, and if I remember correctly, he smiles at the camera. This cues us in to the fact that if the country wasn’t messed up already, the Devil would soon be making it, and eventually the world, his personal playground, ushering in the Apocalypse. Speaking of apocalypse, the poem used in the film—I believe it was composed by screenwriter David Seltzer—is quite haunting and effective: “When the Jews return to Zion/And a comet fills the sky/The Holy Roman Empire rises/And you and I must die/From the eternal sea he rises/Creating armies on either shore/Turning man against his brother/Until man exists no more.”

The Omen II focuses on Damien’s adolescence and his coming to terms with his role as the Antichrist, and The Omen III, with Sam Neil playing an adult Damien bent on world domination, are campy fun, even if they don’t capture the power of the original.


Damien waves

Goodbye, cruel world!


3 Responses to Day 3: The Omen (1976)

  1. duplexofthedamned says:

    Your comparison of “The Exorcist” and “The Omen” is spot-on. If the Devil exists, He has bigger fish to fry, and the quieter moments of “The Omen,” with its picture-perfect privileged family, are as chilling as its scenes of violence. (I seem to remember the frantic mother searching for–and finding–“666” on her ordinary little boy’s scalp.) The “Omen” sequels were bound to disappoint, after this striking original–unless the adult Damien had been played by Mitt Romney instead of Sam Neill. Talk about an apostate of Hell!

  2. staringatangels says:

    Thank you! I’ve gotten flack from other horror fans, who seem to unanimously praise The Exorcist. BTW, what do you think of Rosemary’s Baby? I was bored by it when I first saw it, but that was years ago. I’ve been meaning to watch it again, thanks to some comments by a genre fan whose opinion I highly respect.

    • duplexofthedamned says:

      I thought about mentioning “Rosemary’s Baby” in my previous comment because that movie also blends ordinariness–including wry humor–with creepy suspense (its most terrifying scenes are shot obliquely–no flying rods or severed heads). As for “The Exorcist,” it is important in the history of horror film if only because its gruesome special effects and foully possessed innocent forever shattered the boundaries of what was permissible for a Hollywood movie to show. It packed movie houses in the months after its release (even if a gaggle of teenaged girls in Pittsburgh–who’d sneaked into the theater without their parents’ knowledge or consent–fled at the first heave of green vomit). I mention the Salem-like hysteria that possessed me and my friends over “The Exorcist”–and there were a number of reports of similar reactions–as evidence of this movie’s power, or its hype. I’d like to watch it now to see if it holds up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: